Tag Archives: WP668

Caboose in the News

2006 WP668 on 4 May in San Jose
“Willow Glen homeowner gets approval to add a caboose” is the title of the 2 March 2007 article by Mayra Flores De Marcotte in the Willow Glen Resident (our neighborhood paper) about the San Jose planning director approving our variance permit to move WP668 into our yard.

What fun to be in the news!

More story and photos are on the WP668 website.

If you want to receive Katysblog posts by email, please sign up using the Sign Me Up! button (upper right on Katysblog home).

Image Copyright 2006 by Katy Dickinson

Updated 3 April 2020

Leave a comment

Filed under Caboose Project and Other Trains, News & Reviews

Caboose Approved!

John and Paul and I and one of our neighbors were in the San Jose City Council chambers this morning at 9 a.m. for the hearing on our Development Variance to move caboose WP668 into our yard as an “accessory structure”. It was approved on the Consent Agenda without discussion! Hooray!

The Permit will be signed this week. Some of the entertaining parts of the 7 page long document:

  • Finding: “4. This Variance, subject to such conditions as may be imposed thereon, will not impair the utility or value of adjacent property or the general welfare of the neighborhood, and will not impair the integrity and character of the zoning district in which the subject property is situate in that the reduced setback will facilitate development of an unusually shaped, small lot that might otherwise remain undeveloped into perpetuity and will be compatible with the adjacent residential neighborhood.”
    (I think this means this project does not mess up the current land use or access.)
  • Finding: “6a…the proposed use at the location requested will not:… Adversely
    affect the peace, health, safety, morals or welfare of persons residing or
    working in the surrounding area…”
    (Morals?)
  • Conditions:
    “11f…This is a habitable space….”
    “13…Accessory buildings… shall not contain conditioned space,
    living space, or sleeping quarters.”
    (That is, WP668 is a habitable space but not a living space.)
  • Next step: ask for a Building Permit from San Jose’s Chief Building Official.

After we have the Building Permit, we can move the caboose!

If you want to receive Katysblog posts by email, please sign up using the Sign Me Up! button (upper right on Katysblog home).

Updated 5 April 2020

1 Comment

Filed under Caboose Project and Other Trains, News & Reviews

Cottage for Sale, Must Be Moved

I just finished reading Cottage for Sale, Must Be Moved:
A Woman Moves a House to Make a Home

    by Kate Whouley
    Paperback: 336 pages
    Publisher: Ballantine Books; Reprint edition (April 26, 2005)
    ISBN: 034548018X

Since my family is in the middle of moving a caboose into our backyard, I found many of Kate Whouley’s experiences entertainingly familiar. Cottage for Sale describes the year-long experiences of the author (and her cat Egypt) in purchasing, moving, and marrying a tiny 1-bedroom cottage with her small 1-bedroom house on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. The author is a freelance consultant and writer who wanted a separate room for her office. Her entire house, after the cottage is added on, ends up smaller than 800 square feet, so this is a project and a book on an intimate scale.

Kate Whouley’s motivations for marrying two old houses rather than building a new addition seem partly the lower cost, partly aesthetics, and partly environmental – wanting to reuse and recycle. I share many of her values and motivations. Our own home was built around 1926 (before the land was part of San Jose) and is probably the oldest house in our area. Our neighborhood has recently been invaded by nasty new “monster houses” or “McMansions” – two storeys, 3,000 square feet or more, overwhelming their lots with big driveways, minimal yard space, massive garages, and ugly-or-at-best-boring design – replacing older 1,000 to 2,000 square foot cottages surrounded by large gardens. Check out The Not So Big House for more on the trend toward smaller, better built, spaces.

I don’t agree with all of Kate Whouley’s choices. Uncharacteristically, she put in a new mahogany wood deck rather than use Trex (recycled plastic and waste wood decking material) because, as she writes: “It is sooo ugly!”. We used Trex on a deck and a balcony several years ago and have been very happy with it. It does not burn feet in summer, does not shed splinters or need upkeep, and is already the soft grey of weathered wood. We plan to use Trex for the deck (station platform) which will go along the side of our caboose. However, Kate Whouley’s choice to reuse older windows and doors and in general to spend extra time and money to respect the original style and period of both of her small houses makes good sense to me.

Cottage for Sale documents the small sequence of choices the author made to give a meaningful and useful shape to her home. William Morris:”Have nothing in your house that you do not know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful.”

Leave a comment

Filed under Caboose Project and Other Trains, News & Reviews