Tag Archives: Sun Microsystems

How to Survey

Introduction

This is an revised version of a 2008 web page (first created in 2003 for Sun Microsystems) that brings together in one location key information and resources for how to conduct surveys. The initial audience for this information was the Sun Sigma (Six Sigma) professional community.

How do I know about surveys and data collection? I was certified as a Sun Sigma Black Belt in 2002 and served as a Master Black Belt 2002-2010. I was also in one of the last classes that Dr. Deming taught on statistical management methods, in 1993.

Key Questions

Four questions to ask yourself before starting to create a survey:

1. Why survey?

A survey is one of many good ways to collect information from customers. It may or may not be the best way for your situation. Have you considered other options such as field studies, baseline research, interviews, and focus groups? Many customer groups get surveyed over and over and get very tired of questions: what do you know about the data already collected from the target group?

2. What are the rules?

Information protection, security, and privacy are some policy and legal areas to consider before developing your survey. Local laws about sweepstakes and contests also need to be considered for some survey incentives. If you work for a company, there may be different policies for internal corporate surveys and external customer surveys.

3. What questions?

Developing survey content is as much an art as it is a science. How do you form questions so that the results can be usefully analyzed? What will you do with the answer to each question? How many questions will your target audience answer before abandoning the survey? Is the way you ask the question clear to people from other contexts and countries? An excellent survey takes time and testing to perfect. If you are new to surveying, consider asking a consultant expert for support.

4. What tool?

If you are not having someone else create your survey, there are a number of tools available to you, details are available here under Tools and Services.

Tools and Services

1. Sample Size Calculator, Creative Research Systems web site tool

    “This Sample Size Calculator is presented as a public service of Creative Research Systems. You can use it to determine how many people you need to interview in order to get results that reflect the target population as precisely as needed. You can also find the level of precision you have in an existing sample.”

2. Three-way Percent Calculators

    “Precision and accuracy. Please be aware that there are certain limitations to all web-based calculators. The arithmetic used can lead to errors in some calculations when the numbers get very big or very small. If your work depends on being absolutely, positively accurate to the last decimal place – use a real calculator!”

3. Web-based Surveys

    Web-based surveys are a best practice. You can create a custom web based survey using HTML, PERL, and CGI scripts. For those to whom these are not easily available, survey tool companies provide an easy alternative. Before starting to use any third party survey tool (especially a “free” version), be sure to consider who owns your survey data, how the privacy of your data is protected, and whether the tool company charges for larger numbers of responses.
    • Zoomerang “Create custom web-based surveys and get rapid results. Start using the #1 online survey tool today!”
    • VTSurvey “A web-based tool which enables end users to autonomously create and run online surveys, feedback or registration forms.” (last update: 2005)
    • SurveyMonkey “Intelligent survey software for primates of all species. SurveyMonkey has a single purpose: to enable anyone to create professional online surveys quickly and easily.”
    • SurveyGizmo “SurveyGizmo is an exceptionally powerful survey tool designed to make even the most advanced survey projects fun, easy & affordable.”

Reading

  • “Ask Them Yourself” – How to survey your customers on the cheap, By Ellyn Spragins, FORTUNE – Small Business – Innovation, From the Dec. 2005 Issue of FSB
  • “Keep Online Surveys Short” by (former Sun Distinguished Engineer) Jakob Nielsen – Alertbox, February 2, 2004
      “To ensure high response rates and avoid misleading survey results, keep your surveys short and ensure that your questions are well written and easy to answer.”
  • “Raising Your Return on Innovation Investment” By Alexander Kandybin and Martin Kihn, Booz Allen Hamilton, 2004 (free – web site registration required)
      “There is also is a flaw in the methods by which most companies go about developing new products. Focus groups and surveys elicit consumer opinions, but people can’t know what they don’t know.”
  • “Listening to the Voice of the Customer” by Mark Federman, Chief Strategist, McLuhan Management Studies, McLuhan Program in Culture and Technology, University of Toronto – November 28, 2001 (9 pages, PDF format)
  • “Getting the truth into workplace surveys” by Palmer Morrell-Samuels, Harvard Business Review, February 2002 – Reprint R0202K
  • How to Conduct Your Own Survey by Priscilla Salant, Don A. Dillman. John Wiley & Sons (1994) ISBN: 0471012734
  • An alternative to the survey:
    • “Field Studies: The Best Tool to Discover User Needs” by Jared M. Spool, Originally published: March 13, 2007
        “While techniques, such as focus groups, usability tests, and surveys, can lead to valuable insights, the most powerful tool in the toolbox is the ‘field study’. Field studies get the team immersed in the environment of their users and allow them to observe critical details for which there is no other way of discovering.”
    • “Risks of Quantitative Studies” by (former Sun Microsystems Distinguished Engineer) Jakob Nielsen, Nielsen Norman Group: Alertbox, March 1, 2004. Follow up article: Accuracy vs. Insights in Quantitative Usability, Nielsen Norman Group: Alertbox, 21 November 2011
        “Number fetishism leads usability studies astray by focusing on statistical analyses that are often false, biased, misleading, or overly narrow. Better to emphasize insights and qualitative research.”

See Katysblog 1 May 2008 blog entry How to Survey, Part 2 (Best Practices) for more.
“How to Survey” was refreshed 26 November 2014.

1 Comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business

Flying to See Whales in Laguna San Ignacio, Baja

Last weekend, John and I flew south to see the grey whales at Laguna San Ignacio in Baja, California. Our pilot was Charlie Jackson, Sun Labs’ Webmaster. Our Cessna 182 Skylane II was one of four private planes of the Shoreline Flying Club based in Palo Alto, California. We went out on two boats hosted by Antonio’s Ecotours (based in Laguna San Ignacio). These pictures were taken with disposable water sports cameras. I will write more about our amazing trip but first, here are some whale and dolphin photos. Yes! That is my very own hand petting a baby grey whale.

El Vizcaino Biosphere Reserve Sign
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.1

Pelican
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.3

Laguna San Ignacio
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.2

Shell Mound
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.4

Whale Bones on Beach
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.5

Tour Boat
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.6

Charlie and the Whale
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.7

Grey Whale Nose
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.9

Grey Whale Under Water
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.8

My Hand and a Baby Grey Whale!
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.10

Dolphins
2008.LagunaSanIgnacio.Baja.12

Images Copyright 2008 by Katy Dickinson and John Plocher

Leave a comment

Filed under News & Reviews

UC Berkeley California Centennial features 3 from Sun

UC Berkeley’s alumni magazine, California, recently issued its Centennial Edition, featuring hundreds of Berkeley luminaries. Sun and Berkeley share some particularly bright stars: turning to p.30 you will see a full page photo of John Gage (Sun’s Chief Researcher and Vice President of the Science Office) with Kim Polese (former Sun Java product manager then co-founder of Marimba). Turning to p.104, there is a photo of Eric Schmidt, who hired me when he was Sun’s Software Manager and left after becoming Sun’s CTO to go to Novell and then Google.

Strangely enough, Sun Founder and notable Berkeley alumnus Bill Joy is only mentioned briefly in this issue. Other Cal profiled graduates who did well in the Silicon Valley include Douglas Engelbart, Gordon Moore, and Andrew Grove.

Leave a comment

Filed under News & Reviews

Sun Shot – Six Sigma

I am drinking a caffe latte and checking out the conference room I will be in for the next two days. As a Sun Sigma Master Black Belt, I have been asked to help two Sun groups based in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia Pacific to sort out their roles and responsibilities. A member of a Sigma team I ran several years ago asked me to get involved even though (or maybe because) I am not in their organizational area. It is always interesting to work with groups outside of my own: we both can learn new ways of solving organizational problems.

As usual with a very short Sigma project (Sun Shot as we call it), the focus is on change acceptance, communication, growing together in understanding, and building a list of next steps and future directions rather than in-depth problem solving. The team leaders (both from Europe) and I have been on the phone several times to develop the charter, then we met in-person yesterday to work out the details. Even though the next two days will be very hard work, I am looking forward to the discussion.

Leave a comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business

Wrapping up the Hopper Conference

More than 30 Sun women attended and worked at the Hopper conference in San Diego last week. Working at Sun’s recruiting table and at the Treasure Hunt table gave us opportunities not only to talk with potential new Sun staff but also to get to know each other better. I think I have seen two dozen enthusiastic emails just this morning from the Sun Engineers, executives, and managers who attended the Hopper conference and came home with a buzz.

Several names got inadvertently left off of the presenters’ list on Sun’s press release “Sun Microsystems’ Executives Among Leading Presenters at 2006 Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing”. The whole list of Sun presenters was:

  • Katy Dickinson (Director, Business Process Architecture, CTO and Sun Labs) and Carol Gorski (Director, CTO and Sun Labs HR) 4 October: talk on mentoring at the TechLeaders Workshop on “5 Years of Mentoring by the Numbers”
  • Ingrid Van Den Hoogen (Sun Sr. Vice President, Brand, Global Communications and Integrated Marketing), and Emily Suter Ransford (Sun Business Development Manager, Marketing) 4 October: “It Takes a Village (and Vision): The Role of Communities and Interoperability in Next Generation Networks” poster session
  • Dr. Radia Perlman (Distinguished Engineer, Sun Labs) 5 October: “What’s a PKI, why would I want one, and how should it be designed?” invited speech 6 October: introducing keynote speech by Dr. Sally Ride
  • Katy Dickinson (Director, Business Process Architecture, CTO and Sun Labs) 5 October: “Mentoring by the Numbers” panel by Katy Dickinson, with Dr. Carol Muller (Founder, MentorNet), and Dr. Mary Jean Harrold (Georgia Tech)
  • Dr. Gilda Garreton (Staff Engineer, Sun Labs) 5 October: “Latinas in Engineering” BOF (Birds of a Feather)6 October: “Research in Industrial Labs: How Collaboration Aid Innovation” talk by Tarik Ono and Dr. Gilda Garreton
  • Tarik Ono (Staff Engineer, Sun Labs)6 October: “Research in Industrial Labs: How Collaboration Aids Innovation” talk by Tarik Ono and Dr. Gilda Garreton
  • Dr. Susan Landau (Distinguished Engineer, Sun Labs) 6 October: “Non-Traditional Ways to Advance Your Career” panel

Links and references updated 28 March 2014

Leave a comment

Filed under Hopper - Anita Borg Institute, Mentoring & Other Business

The Role of User Research in the Product Development Process

I was not able to stay for this entire panel but I wanted to be there for as long as possible because of two of the panelists: Jenny Gove and Robin Jeffries. Both are interesting women and very capable professionals who were my coworkers and hallmates at Sun Microsystems before they went to Google. Even though some of the panel’s presentations were superficial, it is always interesting to hear from user experience engineers. This is one of the few computer science disciplines in which women and men seem to participate in roughly equal numbers.

Of particular interest on this panel were some of the comments of Kaaren Hanson of Intuit. Her description of how the success of Quick Books in serving small businesses was ignored for several years was funny and I liked her conclusion that a company needs to be prepared to take advantage of surprises. If I remember her numbers correctly, Quick Books now brings in more than a quarter of Intuit’s revenue.

Blog with regard to a panel presented at the Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing 2006

25 October 2013 – links and text updated

Leave a comment

Filed under Hopper - Anita Borg Institute

Productivity Project

For the last six months, a team with members from both Sun Microsystems’ Software Group and from the Chief Technologist’s Office has been working on a new system to measure software engineering team productivity. This grew out of discussions about the Global Engineering Cost Tool, an internal process and web-based tool developed two years ago in a collaboration between Sun’s Chief Technologist’s Office, Human Resources, Workplace Resources, and Finance.

The Global Product Engineering Cost Tool provides high-level cost comparisons of Sun’s Global Product Engineering (GPE) locations. The Cost Tool provides a reliable and easy to use application that is available long-term, providing the same data about each site, using the same assumptions and updated on a regular schedule. The tool provides a planning vehicle to compare GPE sites. The information in the Cost Tool is static in nature (estimates) and does not reflect the real actual cost. Information is only included if reliable and consistent data is available.

When we contact the Cost Tool users and stakeholders for satisfaction ratings and suggestions, their need for additional non-cost information has often been raised. We finally put on the Cost Tool home page

“Quantified costs do not include many key factors which need to be assessed when considering the advantages of a site. Availability and quality of talent, ease of doing business, ability to distribute team/work, productivity, and other factors must also be evaluated.”

Of these non-cost areas not in the Cost Tool, productivity information seems to be most requested.

After the Cost Tool signoff meeting last December, Tanya Jankot and I got into a discussion with one of our executive stakeholders about productivity. After much talk, we realized that productivity is a high-level measure that is a function of many distinct and often unrelated factors. Without general agreement on the influence factors, success measures, and costs that contribute to productivity and their relative correlation to it, it is impossible to measure and influence productivity effectively. There is a need to understand the factors that contribute to productivity which can be controlled so that it will be possible to begin to measure, analyze, and influence components of productivity.

We first did a great deal of research on what productivity information and systems were already available. We considered the writings and ideas of Barry Boehm, Frederick Brooks, Alistair Cockburn, Geert Hofstede, Walt Scacchi and many others. We then started talking with Sun executives. After reviewing publications from business, government, and the academic world, plus holding dozens of interviews, we came to some conclusions:

  1. The type of work a software team does has a strong influence on how its productivity is measured. That is, if a team is fixing small bugs to order it might be measured in terms of lines of code or function points but if a team is creating a new feature or engaged in innovative software research,
    the measurements are different.
  2. There are more and more widely used systems for measuring productivity in teams working at the level of fixing bugs to order than for teams doing software research.
  3. Whether a software team is all in one location or is split between locations and whether their manager is located with them or is working at a distance has a strong influence on their productivity.
  4. There does not seem to be an existing system that can easily measure productivity in the full range of types of software projects.

25 October 2013 – formatting and links updated

1 Comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business