SEED Term 59% Matched

Since 9 July, we are in the SEED 2008-2009 Mentor Matching Cycle.
That is, the 85 Engineering mentoring program Participants (Mentees)
have created and prioritized their 15-name Mentor Wish Lists and I am
in the process of sequentially contacting
the highest priority potentially available mentor for each of them.
In this first ten days, 50 or 59% have been matched so far.
There are two terms being matched at the same time:

    • September 2008 – September 2009 Recent Hire Term

      which already has 16 out of 23 matched
    • September 2008 – March 2009 Established Staff Term

      which already has 34 out of 63 matched

At one level, I am matching interesting and accomplished individuals,
some of whom I have known for many years and others I am just getting
to know. At another level, I am working a mentor matching system.
I have a running tally with notes on it for each SEED mentee:

    • mentorname #3 – contacted 17 July

      mentorname #1 – no response by 17 July
    • mentorname #1Confirmed 13 July (#1 on list)
    • mentorname #4Confirmed 18 July (#4 on list)

      mentorname #1 – no response by 17 July
    • mentorname #2 – 19 July interested – may take a while to decide

      mentorname #1 – declined – works in her org. 14 July
    • mentorname #1 – Contacted 7/9, out of the office until 21 July
    • mentorname #5 – contacted 15 July

      mentorname #4 – declined 15 July

      mentorname #1 – declined 14 July
    • mentorname #1Confirmed 10 July (#1 on list)

The Participant is not kept informed of each step in the match process. They do not know which potential mentor from the “Wish List” is contacted. Potential mentors need to have space and time to consider the possibilities of a mentoring partnership without risk of offending the potential mentee or interfering with future communications with them or their manager.

More information on the SEED worldwide Engineering mentoring program
is available at
http://research.sun.com/SEED/

Leave a comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business

Fixing up the Sun Prank Museum

On August 03, 2006, I wrote about Sun’s unofficial April Fool’s Day Prank
Museum near the lobby of Menlo Park building 17. This week, my husband
repaired one of the prank artifacts which had become damaged. So, here
are current pictures of the small but historic collection. Plus, some
news stories and links about Sun’s prank history.

Sun Prank Museum Photos

Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

John Repairing 2003

Big Webtone Switch

John Repairing the Big Webtone Switch, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
Poster 2007

Black Box Prank

Poster from 2006 Black Box Prank, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
1990 Scott’s Arrow

1996 Cup

Scott and the Arrow, Java Cup, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
2008 Concrete

Hardened Thumper

Concrete-Hardened Thumper, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
1996 Coffee Station

2007 Black Box Signs

Java Coffee Station, Black Box Signs, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
1993 Sharkstation

Marty Hess’ SunPuck

Marty Hess' SunPuck Sharkstation, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
2008 MySQL

dolphin prank

MySQL Blow up dolphin prank, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
2008 Mardi Gras


Have You Seen This Ham?
Prank

2008 Mardi Gras, Have You Seen This Ham Prank
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson
1990 All the Wood Behind 1 Arrow

Photo of Scott in His Office

1990 All the Wood Behind One Arrow, Photo of Scott in His Office, Sun Prank Museum
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

News and Links on Sun Pranks

Images Copyright 2008 by Katy Dickinson

1 Comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business

Cat or Bear?

My young nephew Daniel has a debate going with his father, my brother
Pete. Daniel’s favorite toy is “Purpley”, a stuffed animal.
The controversy is over whether this stuffy is a bear
or a cat? From the front, Purpley seems to be a bear
but on the back, he has a very cat-like tail. Daniel was
very interested in seeing photos on this blog and agreed to pose
with Purpley for photos to put this important family matter to a vote.

What do you think? Is Purpley a bear or a cat? Comments
are welcome.


Purpley stuffed animal, front
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

Purpley stuffed animal, back
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

Images Copyright 2008 by Katy Dickinson

7 Comments

Filed under Home & Family

Great books mean great decisions

My brother Peter and I share a love of literature and an interest
in law. On his last visit, he gave me a delightful article from the
ABA Journal, published
by the American Bar Association:


Author! Author!


Great books mean great decisions

By Richard Brust , June 2008 Issue

“College lit majors, review that book report you did on 1984, and brush up on your Shakespeare. It could help you brief your next federal case.

University of Chicago assistant law professor M. Todd Henderson searched federal appellate and U.S. Supreme Court opinions for citations to the great works. A student of the law and literature movement, Henderson chose literary passages that gave a decision emotional heft, discounting passing comments and references to an author’s legal problems—for example, James Joyce’s censorship battles.

In his essay, ‘Citing Fiction,’ in the winter 2008 edition of The Green Bag, Henderson lists the most frequently quoted writers. So take notes. Oh, and don’t just rely on the CliffsNotes—the judge will be grading you.

George Orwell (35 citations)

‘The black-mustachio’d face gazed down from every commanding corner. There was one on the house front immediately opposite. BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING YOU, the caption said.’

• From: 1984

• Cited in: Florida v. Riley, 488 U.S. 445 (1989)…”

Quotations from Milton, Homer, Donne, Bolt, Camus, and Shakespeare
are also in this most quoted-in-law list. My favorite:

“… Homer (11)

‘Then I witnessed the torture of Sisyphus, as he wrestled with a huge rock with both hands. Bracing himself and thrusting with hands and feet he pushed the boulder uphill to the top. But every time, as he was about to send it toppling over the crest, its sheer weight turned it back, and once again towards the plain the pitiless rock rolled down. So once more he had to wrestle with the thing and push it up, while the sweat poured from his limbs and the dust rose high above his head.’

• From: The Odyssey

• Cited in: City of Carmel-by-the-Sea v. U.S. Dept. of Transporta­tion, 123 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 1997)…”

Leave a comment

Filed under News & Reviews

WP668 Caboose Stair Rail

Today, Chris Gremich and his young son came over to work out details
on the design of the stair rails for W668, our backyard caboose. Chris
is the master welder who already made the replacement roof ladders for
WP668 (he is “The Iron Expert” of CG Designs in San Jose,
CA, phone: 408-313-3706). Within the next month, we hope to have our new
stair rails, which will also allow us to complete the final inspection
and get sign off on our caboose work permits, at last!

The new rails will be made of steel piping that is similar to the
handrails and grab bars already on the caboose platform. WP668 has leaf
springs which cause it to rock very slightly on its wheels, so the new
rail will be attached to the wood-and-Trex stairs but not to the
caboose itself.

Chris’ 8-year-old son looked at the historical photos of WP668 in
service then asked his Dad if they could have a train engine in their
backyard. Here is a photo of the caboose stairs as they are now
with a temporary hand rail:


WP668 stairs
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

Image Copyright 2008 by Katy Dickinson

Leave a comment

Filed under Caboose Project and Other Trains

Posner Poetry and Prose Project

My daughter Jessica has started “P4”, an intern project for the

Posner Center at Carnegie Mellon University
.
Posner houses rare and historic books and art on the CMU campus in
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. P4 stands for Jessica’s
Posner Poetry and Prose Project.
P4 is an effort to bring high quality recordings of beloved works
of literature to YouTube’s broad audience. Jessica has started
by seeing what is already available. Wonderful efforts she has found so far:


    • The 116 Project
      for which “this cool dude wanders around with a
      minicam and a beat up book of sonnets and asks random people to
      read Sonnet 116 by William Shakespeare”

    • “The Cremation of Sam McGee”
      by Robert W. Service (1874-1958),
      read by Urgelt

    • “If”
      by Rudyard Kipling (1865-1936), read by Dennis Hopper

I am looking forward to more as her P4 project develops over the
semester.

Leave a comment

Filed under News & Reviews

SEED 2008-2009 Mentor Matching 39% Done

Since 9 July, we are in the SEED 2008-2009 Mentor Matching Cycle.
That is, the 85 Engineering mentoring program participants have
created their 15-name Mentor Wish Lists and I am in the process of contacting
the highest priority potentially available mentor for each of them.
In this first six days, 39% have been matched so far.
There are two terms being matched at the same time:

    • September 2008 – September 2009 Recent Hire Term

      which already has 9 out of 23 matched
    • September 2008 – March 2009 Established Staff Term

      which already has 24 out of 63 matched

It usually takes between one and six contacts to make a match. In time,
this requires six weeks to two months for the entire group.
SEED always matches everyone in the term eventually!

Besides the fun of communicating with some of the most talented and
interesting Engineers
in the world (SEED’s mentor and mentee population), I enjoy seeing who
links up. We track all sorts of patterns: gender, geographic location,
professional area, seniority, etc. Some trends are consistent from term
to term: about 2/3 of the mentor-mentee pairs will work at a distance
(that is, they will be widely separated by geography and time zones), very
few mentors will accept a mentee in their own management chain, more
women mentees will ask for women mentors, etc.

I send out a great deal of email during the mentor matching cycle. However,
I also get responses when I see potential mentors in the cafeteria or at
meetings. Some of their answers are very encouraging for Sun’s Engineering
Community even if they mean disappointment for the particular SEED participant
who has requested that mentor. “Can’t take on another SEED mentee – I am
still spending time with my mentee from last year. It worked out great!”
is a rejection I am happy to get.

More information on the SEED worldwide Engineering mentoring program is
available at
http://research.sun.com/SEED/

1 Comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business