Western Pacific Herald Going on Caboose

For the third year, our home will soon be hosting the
Silicon Valley Lines
model train club Christmas party. To prepare for the event,
I have finished painting the bay window markings
on WP668, our backyard caboose. Tomorrow, John is
going to mount the
Western Pacific
herald on the metal plate on the side of WP668.
John wants to preserve the etched shadow of the original WP logo on the original
herald plate, so he lacquered it. Today, he had a 21-1/2″ x 23-1/2″ steel plate cut
(the size of the WP decal we bought from the Portola Railroad Museum), then painted the new plate black. Tomorrow, John will tack
weld the new plate over the old and then mount the decal. WP668 will once
again display the Western Pacific herald!

Here a small size reproduction of the WP logo and a current photo of WP668:

    reproduction WPFRR sign
photo: copyright 2007 Katy Dickinson WP668 caboose November 2008, San Jose CA
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

Images Copyright 2007-2008 by Katy Dickinson

Leave a comment

Filed under Caboose Project and Other Trains

SEED Mentor Matching Cycle Starts

Yesterday, all 109 SEED and PreSEED Engineering mentoring program participants
turned in the final versions of their 10-name Mentor Wish Lists. Also yesterday,
Tanya Jankot cleaned up the data, then she and I decided on who was the top
priority potentially available mentor for each new program participant, then I
sent out the first 65 personal email requests to potential mentors. Today,
I sent out the remaining 44 email requests. I have been getting
many enthusiastic responses from potential mentors. Four have already accepted
mentees (2 GSS SEEDs and 2 PreSEEDs).

Mentor request metrics:

    • There were 442 unique potential mentors requested on the 109 Mentor Wish Lists.
    • 14 potential mentors had more than one request at #1 priority.
    • 65 potential mentors had 5 or more participants request them.
    • 6 had more than ten requests.
    • 14 was the highest number of requests for any potential mentor.

Unless the mentor is very experienced or says they already know
the mentee well, I ask them to have a pre-match discussion by phone or in person
to be sure it is a good fit. I expect many more matches soon. If experience
holds true, it will take three to six weeks to match everyone in both terms.
There will be very few matches toward the end of this month because of
Sun’s winter break.

Mentor matching metrics:

    • In most terms since SEED started in 2001, about 80% of participants were
      matched with one of their top four priority choices. The remainder were matched
      with a Mentor lower down on their Mentor Wish List.
    • About 70% of SEED mentors are executives (Directors, Principal Engineers,
      Fellows, or Vice Presidents) in any term. More senior mentees tend to be
      matched with more senior mentors. For example, in the 2008-2009 terms, the
      Recent Hire term had 65% executive mentors but the Established Staff term
      had 84% executive mentors.
    • In the 2008-2009 terms, 77% of mentor-mentee pairs were working at
      a distance, another state or country from each other.
    • Over 90% of SEED participants indicate satisfaction or strong
      satisfaction with the program in their quarterly reports.
    • 100% of participants get matched with a mentor they requested.

More?

More information on the SEED worldwide Engineering mentoring program
is available at
http://research.sun.com/SEED/

Leave a comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business

SEED Mentor Matching

The 110 new participants in Sun’s worldwide Engineering mentoring program
are now working on their Mentor Wish Lists, due on 3 December. 14 of them
have already submitted their mentor requests. Creating the Mentor Wish List
is probably the hardest part of the SEED program.

The SEED Engineering mentoring program takes a long-term view and does not have a preference for one kind of learning over another. That is, the mentoring partnership learning does not have to have anything to do with the participant’s current job. Some people want to learn to be better technical managers, others want to know how to get their ideas to customers faster. Many want to improve their soft skills: public presentation or speaking, negotiating, conflict management, and coaching. Still others want to improve their work and family balance and still have a great career. It takes time and mature consideration to work through all of this. In creating their Mentor Wish List, each SEED participant needs to
make two hard decisions:

    1. What they want to learn
    2. Who has already accomplished the kind of things they want to do

      (that is, who is already down the path that they see themselves walking)

SEED provides a list of over 430 senior and executive staff who are eligible
and willing to be mentors. Most have provided their biographies,
personal web page links, blog links, and other background information to give
program participants context. Researching potential mentors is like writing
a university paper – hunting for leads, backtracking, looking for key words, hunting again. Most SEED participants spend many days creating their Mentor Wish Lists.

Sometimes the fastest way to find biographical information on someone (both inside Sun’s public web pages and on the public net itself) is to use an internet search. Search results will show if the potential mentor has a Facebook, LinkedIn or other social networking page and if there is a blog associated with them. I advise
SEED participants to search for information about themselves first, to give them an idea of what is out there.

For example, a Google search of “Katy Dickinson” produced 3,590 results with
links to individual blog entries plus:

Which is to say, there is a great deal of public information available on anyone
who has even a small presence in the world.

More?

More information on the SEED worldwide Engineering mentoring program
is available at
http://research.sun.com/SEED/

Leave a comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business

Wedding Reception

On Sunday, we went to a wedding reception at our old church. Two of our friends were married after living together for 34 years. They were married at home but wanted to celebrate with their church family too. The reception was a joyful event with little kids running around and long-time friends of All Saints’ Episcopal Church catching up on each other’s news. My husband and son and I had a good time and were happy to be invited to toast the “new” couple.

I served on the Vestry (Episcopal parish business committee) and outreach committee with both Jeff and John. I know them to be profoundly dedicated to making the world better for those less fortunate than themselves. I have deep respect for both as good men and good Christians. John wrote in the church newsletter:

“After 34 years together, it is wonderful to have an actual anniversary day! We now know what others had told us: marriage *is* different from    ‘domestic partnership’.”

Because of the social controversy and recent divisive public battles over California Proposition 8 (2008), this small community celebration of the lives of two good men had a little flavor of a political event. Spending by groups both for and against Prop 8 and same sex marriage surpassed that of every political campaign in the US except the presidential race. So, the topic was on our minds. Everyone I talked to was full of joy for Jeff and John but also concerned about the pending lawsuits over the Prop 8’s constitutionality and their effect on the lives of our friends.

Leave a comment

Filed under Church, News & Reviews

SMUM Book Club, week 3

Last Thursday started the third week of the new book club at
SMUM Studio 17 (Santa Maria Urban Ministry).
Tonight is our final meeting before the program’s winter break.

How it works:

Every week, each of the older children in the after school homework program
has the opportunity to check out a book from Studio 17’s book shelf, read it,
then give me an oral report. Prizes are offered! Credit will be given for each
book read before Thanksgiving. (Studio 17 does not meet between Thanksgiving
and New Year’s.) Prizes to be paid today in a Target gift card.

Status:

Week two was slower. Many of the kids forgot to bring the books they
finished back to trade in. But several more kids did trade in completed
books. Also, we have two new club members (Edgar and Alejandro).
Here is where we are:

    • Roald Dahl The BFG

      reader: Robert – started 20 Nov
    • James Howe The Bunnicula Collection (3 books in 1 volume)

      1st reader: Abigail – started 6 Nov (read most of book 1, passed it on)

      2nd reader: Jose – started 13 Nov (extended for a 2nd week)
    • Madeleine L’Engle A Wrinkle in Time

      reader: Stephanie – started 6 Nov (extended for a 3nd week)
    • C.S. Lewis The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe

      1st reader: Jose – started 6 Nov (read half, passed it on)

      2nd reader: Abigail – started 20 Nov


      3rd reader: Edgar – started 20 Nov
    • Jack London Call of the Wild

      reader: Alejandro – started 20 Nov
    • Christopher Paolini Eragon

      1st reader: Robert – started 6 Nov (read half, passed it on)

      2nd reader: Carlos – started 13 Nov (extended for a 2nd week)
    • Tamora Pierce Alanna

      reader: Leslie – started 6 Nov (extended for a 3rd week)
    • Tamora Pierce First Test

      reader: Jocelyn – started 6 Nov (extended for a 3rd week)
    • Louis Sachar Holes

      1st reader: Carlos – started 6 Nov (read it, passed it on)

      2nd reader: Robert – started 13 Nov (read it, passed it on)
    • E.B. White Charlotte’s Web

      reader: Abigail – started 20 Nov

The list by reader:

    • Abigail: Charlotte’s Web, The Bunnicula Collection,
      The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
    • Alejandro: Call of the Wild
    • Carlos: Eragon, Holes
    • Edgar: The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
    • Jocelyn: First Test
    • Jose: The Bunnicula Collection, The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe
    • Leslie: Alanna
    • Robert: The BFG, Holes, Eragon
    • Stephanie: A Wrinkle in Time

The Studio 17 kids liked the pictures I posted
from the
Make Your Own Kaleidoscope
software toy. Even more kids requested that I
take their photos so that they can play with their own images next
time. Here are two more Kaleidoscopes:

SMUM Studio 17 kaleidoscope, San Jose CA
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson SMUM Studio 17 kaleidoscope, San Jose CA
photo: copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

Images Copyright 2008 Katy Dickinson

Leave a comment

Filed under Church

Community Abuse

My husband and I frequently go to lunch or dinner at

Dashi
, a good family-owned Japanese restaurant across the street from Sun’s
Menlo Park campus. Dashi has recently been the target of online community abuse,
with an attacker using several names on the popular
Yelp
review system. Fortunately, the loyal and enthusiastic Dashi patrons have
contributed positive reviews. Also, it looks like Yelp has recently taken down some
of the racist negative postings.

In one sense, the community system worked for Dashi – valid positive reviews
swamped hateful attacks. However, it was a painful process for Dashi’s owners
and things could just as easily have gone wrong for them.
Listening to John, Dashi’s owner, talk about his frustration with this difficult
problem made me realize how vulnerable to abuse community-based rating systems
can be. In his own words, John joined with Cassio of Shakespeare’s Othello
in saying:

      Reputation, reputation, reputation! O, I have lost

      my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of

      myself, and what remains is bestial.


      Act II, scene iii

Dashi’s situation reminded me of why eBay recently changed their rating system.
An Old House Journal magazine article by Tony and Celine Seideman in the
November-December 2008 issue said of eBay’s rating system:

      “There are some not-so-nice people on eBay, as there are everywhere. But one
      of the site’s more brilliant features is its rating system for people who buy
      and sell. We’ve found anything below a 97-percent favorable rating is getting
      into risky territory. Though that may sound like perfectionism, the reality is
      that once bad people start getting negative ratings, they simply create new
      identities. So a small number of negative responses can send a big, clear
      message.”

This is good advice. I rarely even consider buying something from an eBay seller
with less than a 98% positive rating. How did eBay’s rating system get so skewed
that 96% is too bad to consider?

EBay used to have a system where both buyers and sellers left each other
positive and negative feedback. The system worked well enough but a small number of
sellers would routinely bully buyers into giving them better feedback than they
deserved by threatening to leave negative buyer feedback. (I had this happen to me
when I dared to complain about a terrible packing job.) There are badly behaved
buyers too – particularly people who do not pay after winning an auction.

EBay’s new feedback system only allows sellers to leave positive feedback. Here
is what eBay’s FAQ says:

      Why are sellers only allowed to leave buyers positive Feedback?

      Buyers can only receive positive Feedback because of their role as a customer. In addition, when buyers received negative Feedback, they reduced their activity in
      the marketplace, which in-turn harmed sellers. If and when buyers abuse Feedback,
      sellers can notify eBay via the Seller reporting hub and immediate action will be
      taken against those buyers.

      (from the eBay Feedback FAQ, updated July 10, 2008)

Community rating systems have great value. They provide a common vocabulary
and provide a context for trust in the electronic world. But online communities
are becoming as complex as normal human societies as more people join in.
I am glad to see eBay’s rating system evolve to protect buyers as well as
sellers. There is another passage in Othello about reputation. In
reading it, remember that Iago who says the lines is the greatest scoundrel
in Shakespeare’s plays and is using these fine words to lure Othello. In
Shakespeare, as in eBay, things are not always what they seem.

      Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,

      Is the immediate jewel of their souls:

      Who steals my purse steals trash; ’tis something, nothing;

      ‘Twas mine, ’tis his, and has been slave to thousands:

      But he that filches from me my good name

      Robs me of that which not enriches him

      And makes me poor indeed.


      Act III, scene iii

1 Comment

Filed under News & Reviews

SEED and PreSEED Selections Announced

Last night and today, we announced the worldwide all-Engineering PreSEED and
Global Sales and Services (GSS) SEED Engineering mentoring program participants for
the January-June 2009 terms. We picked 55 for each term.

Selection Metrics

    About the 55 New PreSEED Participants:
    ======================================
    103 PreSEED applications
    14 disqualified for incomplete applications
    34 had complete applications but they arrived too late for inclusion
    53% selected
    Location of Participants
    1 Belgium, 2%
    10 China, 18%
    1 Czech Republic, 2%
    1 France, 2%
    2 Germany, 4%
    9 India, 16%
    2 Israel, 4%
    1 Italy, 2%
    2 Japan, 4%
    1 Mexico, 2%
    1 Norway, 2%
    1 Korea, 2%
    1 Russia, 2%
    2 Singapore, 4%
    1 Spain, 2%
    1 UK, 2%
    18 USA, 33%
    8 California USA, 15%
    4 Colorado, 7%
    3 Massachusetts USA, 5%
    2 Oregon, 4%
    1 Texas USA, 2%
    Division of Participants
    21 GSS, 38%
    2 Marketing, 4%
    4 Microelectronics, 7%
    22 Software Group, 40%
    2 Storage Group, 4%
    4 Systems, 7%
    1 Worldwide Operations, 4%
    Gender of Participants
    10 Female, 18%
    45 Male, 82%
    About the 55 New GSS SEED Participants:
    ======================================
    98 SEED applications
    19 disqualified for incomplete applications
    56% selected
    Location of Participants
    Australia   4,   8%
    Austria   1,   2%
    Belgium   1,   2%
    China   5,   10%
    Finland   1,   2%
    France   1,  2%
    Germany   5,
    Greece   1,   2%
    India   1,   2%
    Japan   4,   8%
    Singapore   1,   2%
    Spain   3,   6%
    Switzerland   1,   2%
    Taiwan   1,   2%
    United Kingdom   4,    8%
    USA    20,    38%
    California   4,   8%
    Connecticut   2,   4%
    Florida  3,    6%
    Georgia  1,   2%
    Michigan   1,   2%
    New Jersey   3,    6%
    Texas   5,   10%
    Washington   1,   2%
    Gender of Participants
    2 Female, 4%
    52 Male, 96%
    

The 110 new participants are now thinking about their Mentor Wish Lists –
due on 3 December. The first of two phone-in meetings with participants and
their managers to discuss mentor choices is tomorrow morning at 8 am.

More?

More information on the SEED worldwide Engineering mentoring program
is available at
http://research.sun.com/SEED/

Leave a comment

Filed under Mentoring & Other Business